>NEW: Info to the keyword I | >discuss | >create link 
on Jun 14th 2002, 18:48:39, Seamus MacNemi wrote the following about

I

»I«< »I«< »I«< Oy vey iz mir.
»I«s, you can't see without 'em.
An I for an I?
Without an »I«, there could be no »THOU«
If »I« was not »I«, »I« would not exist.


»I« am, therefore I think,»I« am what Iam



   user rating: +1
Can you think about the opposite of »I«? Write down how it works!
Your name:
Your Associativity to »I«:
Do NOT enter anything here:
Do NOT change this input field:
 Configuration | Web-Blaster | Statistics | »I« | FAQ | Home Page 
0.0055 (0.0035, 0.0006) sek. –– 150455074