Female-superiority

When looked at from many different viewpoints one can quickly come to the realization that Females are indeed the superior gender. From the very outset of life to the very end of life there are many factors and evidence that shows just how superior Women are to men. Below you will find some of this proof as well as why I am a true believer in Female Supremacy.

Women carry two x chromosomes, whereas men typically carry one x (sometimes two) and a y chromosome. The y chromosome is smaller and carries less genetic information that the x chromosome does. This, in and of itself might not seem consequential in determining superiority; however it does show that Women's genetic make-up is more complex than men's. Also, the very y chromosome that makes men men also predisposes them to more diseases than Women; such as hemophilia. In fact; Women can be carriers of many things that only affect men such as the aforementioned hemophilia, certain colorblindness and male pattern baldness.

From early on and until menopause Women's primary hormone estrogen protects them from many diseases that men's primary hormone testosterone does not. Men are much more prone to heart-disease and osteoporosis than Women. Although without supplemental hormones after menopause Women will begin to catch up with men in these areas. Men also die sooner and more often than Women in almost every major cause of death. Women also outlive men by an average of seven years.

Women are also more prone to take better care of themselves than men. Women tend to eat better and live a healthier lifestyle than men. Women are on average more organized, and efficient than men.

Yes there are some biological facts that make stupid people seem indeed superior. But humans and human societies are incredibly complex. While it is true that stupid persons think they are better at school, for example, that does not have to say anything. At least, in my opinion, it can't be wholly explained by biolgy. And see, school today still isn't such a great system...success on that field should not be mistaken for superiority.

You really must ignore what these motherless fucks have to say about anything. Their true nature is exposed when they mindlessly followed this word. They are only superior because that is what they have been ordered to be. But they still retain that snobby superiority complex that is at the core of their being. People cannot change who they are, and these women are the root of all evil.

Whatever biology says, the few more years women live and the better marks they get at school are
insignificant. Only a society based on equality is
humane.
History shows what happens if a group of people decides they are superior. Romans, whites, men,
we have seen a lot of examples. There is actually no reason to believe that, if the world was ruled only by women, it would turn into Eden, as claimed by some people here.
But the fact that women today are confident and competent will be good for men too. Because competition is always good.

It shouldn't be about male and female, about black and white, about Christians and Jews.

As long we think like that we'll never understand.

Sometimes I wonder about these activists who are so outspoken in their crusade for female-superiority. Biggotry is what it is, most of us have learned to recognize it and get past it so we can get on with life. Stop over-compensating for your own guilt.

22 i.e. the manner like these interactions in the network of digital discourses carries out themselves, its free shape and availability is the crucial point. The distinction between writing and reading, more exactly said between the documents of writing and reading is first of all medial shifted in digital environments: We can write in the network directly on each page, without having to draw still any tools such as shears, pencil, druckerpresse, because evenly exactly this witnesswitness witness as Tools and programs, when Client are executable Plug in, server programs in the same medium configuration, which are responsible already for displaying the page. The break through-conjugated endlessly by the Dekonstruktivismus that all texts from other texts are together-cut that in each book a further is, which wants out the fact that the texts do not arrive with the readers but as active processprocess processes around the blank characters of the texts, books and discourses around again to constitute exactly, is now in the digital discourses into the code written: